SiteGPT trains a chatbot on your site content for $59 to $429 a month, and its real cost moves with model usage and traffic. Command+K starts at $29/mo with prepaid credits and adds actions taken as the signed-in user. Chatbase and DocsBot are direct low-end equivalents; kapa.ai and Inkeep are the step up.
Competitor pricing and claims verified September 2026 from public sources, each linked below.
We build one of the tools on this list, so read it with that in mind. We have tried to earn your trust the only way that works in a list like this: every price is sourced, every trade-off is stated including ours, and where SiteGPT is the better choice we say so.
Reviews note that real monthly cost depends on model usage and message volume on top of the plan fee, so the advertised tier understates what a busy site pays.
Credits are prepaid and capped. Your monthly ceiling does not move because traffic moved.
SiteGPT is a question-answering chatbot. There is no model for acting as a specific signed-in user, so account-specific work stays with your support team.
Requests like resending an invoice or rotating an API key are completed in the chat, as the signed-in user, with an approval step on anything that writes.
These are recurring themes in publicly published reviews and comparisons of SiteGPT, not our own testing. Every claim links to where we read it. If something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
Ordered by how often they are the right answer for a product team, not by how much we like them. Pricing verified September 2026 from public sources.
$29–$99/mo, prepaid credits, 14-day trial
Product teams who want the assistant to finish the task — resend an invoice, rotate a key — as the signed-in user, with prepaid billing and no metered overage.
Younger product with a shorter reference list than the incumbents, and no self-hosted edition.
$40–$500/mo on message credits
A solo founder who needs a documentation chatbot on a marketing site this afternoon.
Reviews concentrate on billing, refunds and slow support; the agent stops replying when credits run out.
From about $20/mo
Small teams wanting a low-cost documentation bot with minimal setup.
No end-user identity model, limited control in larger deployments.
From roughly $0.10 per ticket
The cheapest way to put an AI layer over an existing helpdesk.
Requires the helpdesk underneath; lives in the inbox, not in your product.
About $0.40 per task
Mid-market teams wanting predictable per-ticket cost on top of their current helpdesk.
Same helpdesk dependency, and four times the unit cost of the cheapest layer.
Sales-led; median contract around $25,000/year
Developer-tool companies with deep technical documentation, high answer volume and budget for an annual contract.
No self-serve signup, limited control over how guidance is delivered.
From about $150/mo cloud; open-source self-host is free
Engineering teams designing custom multi-agent workflows, or who must self-host.
The first working assistant is a build project, and self-hosting is yours to operate.
For a pure marketing-site FAQ bot the low-end tools are interchangeable and you should pick on price. The moment you want the assistant to do something on a logged-in user's account, none of them can, and the choice narrows to Command+K or building it yourself.
Every workspace starts with a 14-day free trial — widget, knowledge base and MCP included. No credit card. Upgrade only when you need scale.
No credit card · 14-day free trial · Questions? Book 1:1 with the founder
